Bon Jovi’s son ‘plied with booze, a hooker’ on class trip to Cuba

This is funny, I thaught EXACTLY THE SAME!!
Jon Bon had a lot of bad luck in the last years. No wonder he got grey.
He does not deserve it. The parents are not responsible for that. I think this Director shouldn´t be a director... I mean, wtf is happening there
... I also wonder when he got to know it...

one pic


I find it very sad that a guy like he, need prostitutes. Also is sad paying for sex.

As Jon and Richie would say, Love for Sale.

Yet, THREE years later, Andersen is STILL working there? Why have Andersen's superiors been protecting him to the point of losing donors -- because HE'S got dirt that he's holding against THEM???

Jon could make a song about it for the next album. You know, Jon read the paper, it gives an opportunity to write something.

Wrong. Drawing such parallels is very tempting but your list is not accurate.
In 2012 there was no BWC tour, Richie toured to promote his 3rd solo album, the BWC tour was launched on February 10, 2013.
Richie was reportedly not in rehab.
David won four Tony awards in 2010, not in 2012.



No wonder the BJ kids love their school so much!
https://youtu.be/qLlbbSf3jgU


http://www.bensonhurstbean.com/2015/...s-son-lawsuit/


http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/...icle-1.2240145

I'm so lucky I'm not a millionaire and can't afford to send my kids to private schools! *sigh of relief*


Now wait a minute! Even in the scandal department & tabloid coverage Jon has to top Richie?

LOL! But though Richie had to endure the public humiliation of effectively admitting he'd been a horny-as-a-brass-band chump, he healed his wounds with the salve of public sympathy he manufactured by standing up for himself. To top that, Jon would have to explain why he and his wife haven't moved heaven and earth to get Andersen fired.

They could easily have made things tough for the school by accusing Andersen of endangering/contributing to the delinquency of minor; pandering (U.S. legal-speak for pimping); or even facilitating statutory rape. Or did Andersen have their PERMISSION to supply underage Jesse with booze, nicotine, and hookers in a country that does NOT yet have official relations with the United States? Suppose he'd been arrested? Suppose he'd been attacked? Suppose he'd been held for ransom? And at the risk of sounding sexist, would Jon and Dot have allowed Stephanie to take such a trip?

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/...icle-1.2243928

It's interesting that this article has been up since June 2 and no one commenting in this thread posted it.

Part of it states:

"But the board insisted that a school-sponsored investigation turned up no evidence that he supplied prostitutes to his teen charges.

“The school determined that at no time did either of the Poly students on the trip have sexual relations of any kind with any prostitutes in Cuba, nor was there any evidence that Mr. Andersen had ever tried to engage prostitutes on their behalf,” the email reads. “The investigation also determined Mr. Andersen had exercised poor judgment in certain instances while in Cuba as a representative of Poly.”

Anderson was “disciplined” in 2013 after school officials learned of the late 2012 trip."

Male cattle droppings -- his judgment wasn't "poor" enough to get him fired? Aside from the fact that the school had a vested interest in clearing Andersen, what's really going on over there?

It took me a minute, but...

I think I've just added a new swear word (phrase) to my vocabulary!

It pays to increase your word power!

This sucks. Perfectly might have prostitutes and of course, is as discrete and sordid that is not easy to submit evidence. I doubt they have gone to Cuba just to bathe in a pool and sunbathing.