That is extremely laughable! I just did a quick google translate and got the most of it.
Here is a summary of their arguement...
5 Reasons why Bon Jovi should'nt get the MTV Global Icon Award.
1. "
His best moments were 30 years ago"
2. "Songs are too similar to each other"
Ok this one is granted, but the example used in the article is "How many would be able to differentiate Always and Bed of roses" ... They are completely different songs!
3. "Say you like Bon Jovi is marginal"
Not 100% on what the point is... the translation is a bit too muddled for me. Something to do with album sales.
4. "50% of the group remains unknown to the masses"
True, but this can be said about many bands... U2, Guns N Roses etc.
5. "They are the worst icon ever"
This is where it really gets funny. The author uses his/her own opinion on the band as a valid reason why they arent worthy of the award. They go onto to mention how crap the HAND album cover is as well as the film clip for it - which also why the band arent worthy of the award
WHAT A JOKE!