View Single Post
 
Old 09-08-2015, 02:26 AM
Rdkopper's Avatar
Rdkopper Rdkopper is online now
Senior Member
The Distance
 
Join Date: 04 Oct 2008
Gender: male
Posts: 8,669
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jovimimi View Post
Shanks IS part of the band in the studio - now he needs to complete his job on stage - I think it would be a lot better to have the musician who made the songs perform on stage - it is more logic to me, then the band would be a band.
I can't believe I am writing this but - honestly - to have just Jon involved in the creation process on stage is a problem for a BAND (unless Dave writes and works for Bon Jovi next time but so far BB is Dave less)

I vote yes not because I love Shanks but because Shanks would complete the process as a band

(I have no clue if he is a good guitarist live but at least he would perform his songs)
That logic makes no sense. What about the other 12 albums? Phil is replacing Richie, Shakes just played on BB.

So you want to drop Phil and have John relearn all Richie's songs because he helped create BB? And then there is a rumor that Phil will be playing on the new album so now logic even becomes more twisted...

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
__________________
World’s Most Professional Bon Jovi Fan!!!
Reply With Quote