Quote:
Originally Posted by semigoodlookin
The problem was Hilary Clinton, who will go down as the biggest failure in modern American politics. She had everything behind her, a popular president, massive resources, a former president husband, a hugely popular first lady, experience, and most other things.
The problem is, she's Hilary Clinton. She may be a lovely person, but outwardly there is something dislikeable about her, and she is/appears to be untrustworthy. A popular democratic candidate would have won states like Michigan, Wisconsin, etc. last night. Trump would have delivered a bloody nose, but not an incisive victory that gives the Republicans control of Washington.
Supporters of the Trump movement think he will deinstitutionalize D.C. Maybe that is his goal, but the Republicans are more about sticking to capital formulas than the dem's are, so I would caution against Trump voters who expect sweeping changes.
There was definitely an outpouring of disenfranchisement last night, it seems many are willing to simply ignore what Trump was and is in favor of getting behind strong rhetoric. He did not win a Republican race, he run as a populist candidate.
I guess now there are a few options. Trump as fairly predicted his rise accurately, so perhaps he is not as stupid or one-minded as people think and will deliver in the Oval Office. Perhaps he will run amok as is the fear (this is the least likely), a course that I believe would lead to him not finishing his term. Perhaps he will be reigned in by the RNC and become their puppet. And obviously, the most likely is he will become just another president and a footnote in history, as Hilary would have.
|
Spot on.
Hillary surely has her flaws, but she was a low-risk low-reward candidate. Which, ideology aside, I believe is still a preferable option when there's no terrible crisis or other disruptions.
The US will be fine as their presidents don't have that much power; but the foreign policy (NATO, Middle East), where that person is very influential now seems very uncertain; given how Trump's stance towards NATO has been more negative, while comments on Putin have been more positive; than any recent president. As someone who lives in a post-Soviet country (Lithuania), there is a lot of concern here. I just hope he fails to make significant change (and become a 'footnote', as you said), because the western democratic world has a lot to lose these days...